Get Noticed
Posts tagged Mass Following
The Economics of ‘Mass Tweeting’ And ‘Mass Following’
Feb 15th
I have briefly discussed the concept of mass tweeting as a tactics used for garbing attention to the mass tweeter’s account with the hope of transforming some of those who are followed into followers. I have stated that mass tweets can only lead into attracting one kind of Twitter users, that is ‘mass followers’. This is a normal phenomenon since mass following requires searching for certain keywords, which means that those who tweet a lot have more chances of being found in search queries and eventually followed by mass followers.
What I will question in the current post is the common belief that such tactics are futile. Indeed, many would argue that mass tweeting is bad strategy for marketing since it attracts the wrong kind of crowd. I would argue the opposite. I think mass followers and mass tweeters are the right kind of crowd to be in touch with, especially for those who are into social media marketing. I will try to explain why it is so.
Mass tweeting will not only attract mass followers
First, we have to understand that mass tweeting will not only attract mass followers. There will always be a small amount of ‘curious’ Twitter users that will follow a mass tweeter simply because of the fact that there are tons of people who listen to Twitter streams and that most of them are ‘followers’ who don’t tweet that much. These curious users are valuable because they have the potential to blossom into qualified leads, meaning that if they are exposed to the right message, they will be interested in the product or service that is promoted. Since the proportion of these curious users will be small compared to mass followers, it will be hard to justify the investment of all that effort in gaining only a few potential qualified leads.
Mass followers can be profitable too
However, a closer examination of mass followers will show that they are also valuable to a certain degree. Mass followers might not become qualified leads, but they know that most of their followers will not be qualified leads either because they have been acquired through either mass tweeting or mass following. Therefore, the mass follower has to adopt a more rational relationship with most of his friends and followers. He will have to enter into a ‘retweeting association’ with his followers meaning that they retweet each other in other to profit from each other’s ‘curious followers’ that they have each amassed through mass tweeting and mass following!
Now, this is going to create serious traffic to a promoted product or service only if there are enough marketers connected to each other and constantly retweeting each other. This implies that they all use some king of automatic retweeting application that saves them from having to be retweeting 24/7.
The effects of automated tools on Twitter user experience
Who says automatic application means spam. My view is that while this is close to black hat social media optimization, it is not so bad since the marketing/SMO community seems to be very small compared to the whole Twitter network of 25 million users. In other words, these automatic retweeting software will only not seriously affect Twitter’s quality of service or user experience because spam will be filtered out by the ‘curious users’ who happen to be part of the SMO clique. However, these software will insure the majority of marketers that there message will reach a critical amount of curious users, hoping that they create the proper word-of-mouth.
An Inquiry Into The Mind of a Follower's Follower
Nov 10th
One of the things that have amazed me in Twitter is the concept of mass following. The point with mass following is that some of those people that you follow will end up following you back, so you are building a follower-base. I wondered what happens in the mind of someone who follows someone that followed him and I have come up with a few profiles.
The Newbie
Some will follow people who follow them because they are told that it’s a Twitter etiquette. If this is true, then celebrities who happen to be those with most followers are the most unethical of Twitter users. Newbies think that it is a right thing to do so they follow people. Sometimes, they go as far as reading stuff and clicking on a few links. Sometimes, they even get influenced by promotional content because they don’t know it is promotional content. These are some of the most important people on Twitter. They are the ones who are will have the most effective viral effect because they don’t understand how the whole Twitter thing works.
The Selfish Fool
These are people who think that they are so cool, smart, fun and that it is only natural that they get followed. They follow back because of the Twitter etiquette again. These are usually selfish people who do not tend to interact with other and have more monologues that dialogues. Don’t put them in any of your Twitter lists.
The Spammer (a.k.a. the Marketer)
This is someone who is actually looking to be followed by mass followers. His trick is to mass spam and wait for people to follow him. Some of them are really clever and keep a good following/follower ratio so it doesn’t show up when they themselves perform mass following. In doing so, they get somehow genuine followers. These guys are usually very interactive and will get involved in conversations, which makes them actually be great Twitter friends!
The Ones I Forgot
Let me know if there are profiles I forgot. Note: if you follow those who follow you because they offer good tweets, then you are none of the above. I personally follow people who as a rule of etiquette when someone has something good to say.
Use Twitter Lists to Manage Your Click Ring (a.k.a. Followers)
Nov 9th
This guy is following exactly 2000 people…
If you are an online marketer using Twitter and that you have 30k followers and are following almost as much or more people, you probably believe that Followers are good for the following reasons:
- By having a large Follower-base you look credible as a marketer;
- They make you look like a social media expert, which you most probably claim to be (and maybe you are…maybe social media is about spamming);
- They click on those bit.ly links you add to your Tweets, which you probably sold to people as a way of increasing traffic to their website;
- Retweet exchange, i.e. you both retweet each other; and
- Click on those ads in those bit.ly links you add to you Tweets, which is your personal website. Of course you do the same thing for them because only you click ring members click on your adds.
An invitation to exchange retweets…how social!
If this is your case, Twitter just wants you to know that it cares about you. After all, you are the ones producing all those tweets. They are very thankful and thus serve you with this useful new function: Twitter Lists. Twitter understands that nobody can manage hundreds or thousands of followers. Tools are needed to be able to classify and sometimes send targeted messages to followers. Twitter Lists will just do that. I mean you need the right tools to deal with those thousands of clicks you have to perform in a day in order to make a decent living. Well, Twitter is empathetic to your needs and offers Twitter lists: the best way to manage all those who follow you because you follow them! Twitter doesn’t want you to go out there and use another Twitter application. Stay with Twitter: they’ll treat you well.
Thanks to Twitter lists, those followers who are members of your click-ring can be a listed apart so you know that you have to go there and click on their Google ads from time to time. If you have a deal with some of your followers to click on their bit-ly links so it looks like his Twitter strategy is generating traffic, then you might wanna put them in a list apart too.
I think all inbound marketers should be happy with Twitter lists.